🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.