🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear he could survive defeat by Grimsby. Survive an important European final against one of the worst Spurs sides for many years. He withstood home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, squandering some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to engage. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, the coach took on the executive and seems to have failed. The most casual observer will notice the irony here: a coach who frequently berated at his players for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

In truth, this entire painful saga appears to portray the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has proved himself as one of football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which the club's mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

The Tactical Conflict Over Formation & Philosophy

For example, it was the director , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties faced pushback. However, these judgements hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, with no penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

An Supreme Authority Behind the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his superior the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to adopt analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he announced that United’s style of play “will be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical football matters, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Whom else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Order: Executives Over Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and drive to go into an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the strategy in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, yet finally accountable if it arrives poorly or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face for a club they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined whereas the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss him for using too much 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and later bin them for taking too long. And above all be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.